Home for all Nintendo fans


SEGA should have been exclusive?

Share
avatar
ADMRL
Founder
Founder

NNID: : Tickletot
GamerTag: : Tickletot
Posts : 292
Experience : 2165
Join date : 2015-11-05
Location : Texas

SEGA should have been exclusive?

Post by ADMRL on Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:33 am

Do you guys think SEGA's Sonic games would have done better for the company if they would have released their IP's onto Nintendo platform only?

They said they aren't releasing anymore games to console anymore and I'm guessing its due to poor sales, I think they should have made their Ip Nintendo exclusive and it would have saved them lots of money.


_________________

★NNID: TickletTot
 3DS: Ask
  GT:TickleTot
avatar
ObeyGamer
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 101
Experience : 1518
Join date : 2015-12-19

Re: SEGA should have been exclusive?

Post by ObeyGamer on Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:24 am

they could have done with but they were probably hoping to gain some fans by trying to have a bigger install base on all three consoles, i don't think that worked out for some of the sonic games, not all of them failed though.


_________________
avatar
Lightning
Regular Lvl 3
Regular Lvl 3

Posts : 107
Experience : 1259
Join date : 2016-04-07
Location : 'merica

Re: SEGA should have been exclusive?

Post by Lightning on Sun Apr 10, 2016 2:29 pm

I think that if Sega did stay with just Nintendo that Nintendo should have just bought enough stock in their company for SEGA to stay exclusive to Nintendo. But with Sega going mobile, it's not going to last very long, because I personally feel there won't be enough money in it for them to stay on as just mobile only for a lot of their games.

Sponsored content

Re: SEGA should have been exclusive?

Post by Sponsored content


    Current date/time is Thu Oct 19, 2017 7:45 am